Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dino Alonso's avatar

John, your words burn true. The Sermon on the Mount is the stone they stumble over, and they’ve chosen to bury it rather than be broken by it. They want Jesus with a sword, not Jesus with mercy. And you’ve named the cost of that better than I could.

But here’s where I find myself stuck: what do I do with that knowledge? My resources are limited. I don’t stand in a pulpit, I don’t have a crowd to move. What I have is my own mind and conscience, and they’re not immune to the same temptations. I can’t stop the revision of Jesus out there, but I can refuse to let it take root in me.

For me that means choosing, again and again, where I lean. Some mornings it’s a struggle just to turn away from the noise. Some days I feel the itch to strike back, to meet contempt with contempt. And maybe that’s the real test: to set down the sword in my own hand, even when rage feels justified.

It’s not grand. It won’t make the news. But if I can guard one small space of stillness, if I can offer decency where I’d rather sharpen the blade, then at least I’ve resisted becoming the thing I despise.

And maybe that’s where it has to start: not with their hypocrisy, but with our own choices, repeated until they harden into something that looks a little like integrity.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

No kidding. If your version of Christianity thinks Jesus would be a gun nut and that the Sermon on the Mount is some kind of Marxist tract, you’re probably doing it wrong.

Expand full comment
39 more comments...

No posts